transferkvm.blogg.se

Substitute the word "honey" for a few pages, and you'll see how damn unnatural that sounds. We also get frequent descriptions of the rest of his body hair, I'm wondering if the author has a fetish. Jean-Claude is some sort of pansexual Anne Rice bondage gear enthusiast. Number of men in my life I've found attractive with long hair: none. I have no idea why she likes him, and I have absoLUTELY no idea why he likes her, except that he appears to like being bitched at a lot. He is either doing this by being goopy, or by being violent and then being kind of nasty about it. Richard is some sort of man-boy who spends a lot of time expressing or worrying about his feeeeeelings. She is not smart, she does dumb selfish things and I do not like her. There is no connection there, it's just the author moving the plot along by dropping left-field realizations into Anita's lap. That's not valid - you can't say "Janet looked at the plant, and immediately sensed that the priest from three chapters ago had worn the wrong hat". There's nothing there, sometimes literally the author will insert the idea that Anita's picked up on some nuance that is not there.

Unfortunately, I think the author thinks Anita is smart, and so I end up reading passages that are meant to show Anita getting some sort of insight, when no. She is pushy, bitchy, violent, frequently obstinate, has incredibly poor impulse control, and she does not strike me as particularly smart.